The first email altercation came on the issue of the Air Boat Curfew. My knee-jerk reaction to this item was that a 7pm to 7am curfew was reasonable. But then I discovered the infringement this was on people who fish at night, some of whom do so for a living. Also, there are already noise levels set by law, and most people observe these. This is the broad brush attempt by a few to get the rest of us to go after the even fewer. Enforce existing laws against those who break them. Don’t use them as an excuse to persecute people you just don’t approve of.

Anyway, here are the latest versions of the ballot initiatives. Comment to your heart’s delight:

Constitutional Amendment 1: YES No public financing of campaigns. No spending limits. This leads to less information than we have already.

Constitutional Amendment 2: YES to homestead tax credit for deployed military personnel.

Constitutional Amendment 4: NO This amendment is an attempt to put comprehensive land use decisions on the ballot as needed. It keeps your elected officials from representing your interest and suppresses development.

Constitutional Amendment 5: YES An attempt to end squirrely gerrymandered districts in the state legislature created for particular constituencies.

Constitutional Amendment 6: YES Same as 5 for Congressional districts.

Constitutional Amendment 8: YES Loosens the Class Size Amendment passed in 2002 by a few students per class. I was against that amendment because it was a “magic bullet” that would raise the cost of education by mandating more classrooms.

Non-binding Statewide advisory Referendum NO Meaningless straw poll on whether there should be an amendment to the US Constitution that demands a balanced budget without raising taxes. I don’t believe in “magic bullets”. I believe in electing good representatives and firing bad ones.

County Question 1: NO Don’t make it easier to put more ballot initiatives on the ballot. Just fire bad commissioners.

County Question 2: YES If the citizens have used the process to pass a law by referendum, the commissioners should not be able to easily overturn it.

County Question 3: YES I believe this keeps the county referenda from overriding municipal rights.

County Question 4: NO This is highly suspect monkey business, changing the definitions to get county officers out from under the Florida Constitution.

County Question 5: NO Different monkey, same business.

County Question 6: YES The monkey I can live with. We get non-partisan elections for Sheriff, Supervisor of Elections, Clerk of the Circuit Court, Property Appraiser and Tax Collector.

Initiative Ordinance 1: NO This is the airboat ban from 7pm to 7am. As a homeowner on 39th Ave., I have reconsidered my position on this for a few reasons. 1)I don’t live near a lake, and question whether this is any of my business. 2)This time is way too restrictive. 3)After talking to several people and hearing a really good discussion on Talk of the Town about this, I believe this is another case of NIMBYism, which I loathe.

The final result was 8,375 FOR the Amendment and 11,717 against according to the Supervisor of Elections Unofficial Final Results, posted at 8:50 PM. If you want the financial breakdown, according to the latest financial reports available, Equality is Gainesville’s Business spent about $130,000 to bring in the final vote total AGAINST the amendment, and CitizensFor Good Public Policy spent about $63,000. That makes for about $11.25 per vote to defeat it, and $7.50 per vote in the failed attempt to pass it.

The lesser known Amendment 2, which prevents future city commissions from selling lands acquired for conservation, recreation, or cultural purposes without a referendum being put before the voters, got 15,226 FOR (41.68) and 3,643 AGAINST (58.32%.

In the city commission races, in the At-large 1 contest it was a first round knock out for the incumbent. Jeanna Mastrodicasa was re-elected with 10,281, or 58.13%. Her closest challenger was newcomer Robert Krames with 4,435 (25.08%), followed by Tom Cunilio with 1,108 (6.27%), Richard Selwach with 1,094 (6.19%), and James Schlachta with 767 (4.34%).

The single District 1 race was also a big win for the incumbent, Sherwin Henry, with 1,940 (68.21), and his opponent, Marcia Wimberly with 904 (31.79).

So, there will be no runoff election next month, but there will be more analysis later.

Whenever I hear that there have been actual incidents in Gainesville in which a man uses a public women’s room at will, flaunting the immunity that the Transgender Bathroom Ordinance affords him, I also hear that the supporters of Charter Amendment One are, “just making that up”. And it’s easy for them to say so if the Sun or TV 20, or any other news outlet declines to do any investigative reporting. But what happens when there is an actual police report and surveillance camera video? The answer will still be, “they are just making that up” …if no one reports it.

Well, here is a start. I have a police report with the victim’s name and contact information blacked out. I don’t have the video…yet. But I am sure that someone with “legitimate” journalistic creds could get a look. But will they? And what else are we not hearing? Or seeing?

So far, we are getting a very selective view of this whole public safety issue. The Gainesville Chamber of Commerce has been cowed into taking a stand against Charter One because they have drunk the Kool-Aid. They are parroting the line that this is about discrimination. They are agreeing with the ideologically driven letters to the Sun that call Charter One supporters bigots. Meanwhile, when a local supermarket manager calls the police because women complain that a man just walks into the ladies room while they are in there, the police can only tell him that they are in “uncharted waters”.

We cannot depend on our institutions to protect us. They are selling out to politically driven policy makers who can make their lives miserable if they want to. Business people are worried about taking a stand because they feel threatened by the specter of being labeled “intolerant” in a University town. And I feel their pain. I know what it is like to have a customer drop my service because they disapprove of my stand on a moral issue. So much for tolerance.

In the secret place of the voting booth, no one will be able to watch what you are doing. No one will be able to exact revenge. But if you want to organize and work together with others who want to get the word out about Charter One, you may find yourself being defamed and intimidated. And it will probably go unreported.

In other food for the rumor mill: The ACLU has a full time staffer working with the Charter One opponents, Equality is Gainesville’s Business. And EIGB has hired a full time campaign manager. And the out of town money continues to roll in. EIGB has a $50K war chest as of the last financial report, and it’s coming from all over the US. Gainesville is a battleground city. Will you opt out of this struggle?

Rememeber, on election day they will count the votes, not the money.

Comments, please.

Find the video here.

Find those sample ballots here, which will include an audio version.

All the city candidates for District one and at-large district 1 have been invited to participate. It is also likely that there will be representatives both for and against Charter Amendments 1 &2.

The donor was another political action committee (PAC) called “Basic Rights Gainesville” (BRG). This PAC was created by Gainesville City Commissioner Craig Lowe. He also created the recipient of the donation, EGB. He created EGB in June of 2008. The first donation was recorded on 6/24/08.

On October 3, 2008, Craig Lowe filed papers with the Supervisor of Elections registering the creation of Basic Rights Gainesville (BRG). The first donation, recorded the same day, was a $5,000 check from another PAC, Basic Rights Montgomery of Silver Spring, Maryland. This money was then recorded as an expenditure, in the form of a donation from BRG to EGB. EGB recorded that donation on December 24, 2008. Then, last month, Craig Lowe notified the Supervisor of Elections on January 9th that the last quarter report from BRG was its last. BRG was disbanded. It had served its purpose as a conduit for the donation from Basic Rights Montgomery.

What most of us want to know is, is this illegal? No, I don’t think so. The next question is, why the subterfuge? Why not just take a donation directly from Basic Rights Montgomery instead of creating a Gainesville entity to pass it through? It looks deceptive.

The very purpose of all this reporting and making things a public record, and putting them online is to make campaigns more transparent. The people who championed these laws and practices did so because they thought that the people of a community should know when big donors from out of the area are trying to influence their elections. In the spirit of those laws, I will try to keep these issues out in the Sunshine. I’m sure our city commissioners will agree that this is the right thing to do.

I welcome Craig Lowe or anyone else in EGB to take all the space they need in this blog to respond.

Of the $24,333.30 donated to Citizens for Good Public Policy, $3,300 came from businesses, and the rest was given by individuals. There was also a $500 contribution made by the Rock of Gainesville, a church. It was returned. I can only presume that is because a church is somehow prohibited from endorsing one side in an election. If you include that donation, which came from within Alachua County, a total of $925 came from outside Alachua County, or 3.8% of the money donated to this cause. If you don’t include the Rock’s contribution, it is 3.9%

On the other side of this fight is a group calling itself Equality is Gainesville’s Business, a political action committee (PAC) registered with the Supervisor of Elections. Thus far, they have collected $23,456.57. At first, it appears that $9,831.85, or 41.9%, came from out of town. However, a closer look reveals that one of our “local” donations of $5,000 came from a local entity that has only one donor, another entity that is located in Maryland. Basic Rights Gainesville is the next biggest donor beside the National Gay and Lesbian Talk Force. That takes the out of town number to 63%.

Yes, someone started a PAC in Alachua County, ostensibly to hide the fact that the money comes from out of state. I know that sounds like I’m saying that someone is up to no good, but when I went to the SOE website to find out who set up this local entity, there is no name and address on the form. So, there is some pretty sloppy work being done here if we are trying to achieve some sort of transparency in our system. I have also gone to the State Division of Elections and their database returns error messagges when I search for Basic Rights Gainesville. I have emailed them about it this morning.

What we do know is that their single $5,000 donation came from another organization called Basic Rights Montgomery. This group is much more visible. The Nationall Gay and Lesbian Task Force was instrumental in starting this group to fight another transgender bathroom ballot initiative in Montgomery County, Maryland. The NGLTF was the biggest donor to Equality is Gainesville’s Business.  It looks like they are the recipients of some leftover donations from Maryland.

And how did that battle go? It depends on who you ask. The short version is this: a local group started collecting signatures to get a measure on the ballot to overturn a transgender bathroom ordinance similar to Gainesville’s. They needed 25,000 signatures. They got them. Then their opponenets petitioned the court to change the number that was needed after the time to get them had expired. The court changed the number to 27,000, and the game was over. Read about it here.

So, who started Basic Rights Montgomery? Well, it’s a another group called Equality Maryland. And one of their donors is the Unitarian Universalist Church. I had to get around to that because it is very instructive to the rest of us that if you use enough paper entities to funnel your money to a political campaign, it is perfectly legal. I suppose.

This story is developing…

The ordinance, which was passed last January in a firestorm of opposition from religious leaders, business owners, concerned parents and African-Americans in conspicuous numbers, allows anyone to self-identify as “transgendered” on the basis of how he or she feels at any moment. The ordinance has been castigated as a loophole for bathroom peredators, who could even sue a business owner for attempting to keep unsavory men from lurking in the ladies room. At least, that was the assessment of the city’s own attorney when pressed for an answer by former City Commissioner Rick Bryant. In spite of this apparent legal nightmare for the businesses in the city limits that would be forced to comply with the ordinance, City Commissioners Jack Donovan, Jeanna Mastrodicasa, and Craig Lowe joined the Mayor in her insistence that this ordinance was a needed remedy for transgendered persons.

The Mayor says she believes that the City of Gainesville will step up and deny this charter amendment, which would effectively undue the offending Gender Identity provisions.

The City Commission will be meeting this Thursday, December 4, to make the decision. It will be a great opportunity to see how they work, and how willing they are to let the citizens decide on this issue. A lot of people worked very hard to get this on the ballot. More people signed the petitions to get this on the ballot than normally vote in City of Gainesville Elections.

************************

“During their discussion on November 6, 2008, the Commissioners specifically asked for citizen input regarding the ballot language because several individuals who support their side were in the audience and presented what the commissioners thought were good ideas.  Let’s provide them the citizen comments they requested.  Below is the website you can go to and listen to the entire discussion, about 50 minutes:

http://gainesville.granicus.com/MediaPlayer.php?view_id=2&clip_id=450

“Once you get to the site, if you only want to listen to the part of the meeting which pertains to the gender identity issue please follow these instructions:

1. Look to left-hand side of screen, under the picture
2. Click on the up/down cursor which is located to the right of the words “jump to”
3. Once the listing appears,scroll down to the line which reads: 080410 “Proposed city charter amendment”

“The video will start playing at the beginning of the gender identity discussion.

“The following is the website which contains the agenda item for December 4, 2008, the item is on page 35 of the agenda:

http://legistar.cityofgainesville.org/meetings/2008/12/8654_A_City_Commission_08-12-04_Meeting_Agenda_(Long).pdf

“The following are the email addresses for our city officials, please send your email to all emails and blind copy citizensforgoodpublicpolicy.org.  The reason we are requesting for you to blind copy citizensforgoodpublicpolicy.org is so that we can have an accurate count of those who oppose what the city commission is attempting to do:

HanrahanP@cityofgainesville.org
hawkinswt@cityofgainesville.org
mastrodij@cityofgainesville.org
henrysl@cityofgainesville.org
poel@cityofgainesville.org
DonovanJF@cityofgainesville.org
LoweSC@cityofgainesville.org
legal@cityofgainesville.org
hauck@cityofgainesville.org

“Sorry for the long email, but I wanted to provide enough information for you to understand what and why we are requesting your support at this time.  If you have any questions please email to citizensforgoodpublicpolicy.com.

“Thanks in advance.

“Cain Davis
Chairperson, CGPP”
www.citizensforgoodpublicpolicy.org